MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399503568 · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.63779

Pathogenic <scp><i>FLNA</i></scp> variants affecting the hinge region of filamin A are associated with male survival

2024· article· en· W4399503568 on OpenAlexaff
Emma M. Wade, Tim Morgan, Grégory Gimenez, Zandra A. Jenkins, Hannah Titheradge, Marie O’Donnell, David Skidmore, Mohnish Suri, Stephen P. Robertson

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicRNA regulation and disease
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFilaminFLNAGermlineBiologyPhenotypeGeneticsExonHingeGeneCytoskeletonCell

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pathogenic variants in FLNA cause a diversity of X-linked developmental disorders associated with either preserved or diminished levels of filamin A protein and are conceptualized dichotomously as relating to underlying gain- or loss-of-function pathogenic mechanisms. Hemizygosity for germline deletions or truncating variants in FLNA is generally considered to result in embryonic lethality. Structurally, filamin A is composed of an N-terminal actin-binding region, followed by 24 immunoglobulin-like repeat units. The repeat domains are separated into distinct segments by two regions of low-complexity known as hinge-1 and hinge-2. Hinge-1 is proposed to confer flexibility to the otherwise rigid protein and is a target for cleavage by calpain with the resultant filamin fragments mediating crucial cellular signaling processes. Here, three families with pathogenic variants in FLNA that impair the function of hinge-1 in males are described, leading to distinct clinical phenotypes. One large in-frame deletion that includes the hinge leads to frontometaphyseal dysplasia in affected males and females, while two germline truncating variants located within the exon encoding hinge 1 result in phenotypes in males that are explained by exon skipping and under-expression of a transcript that deletes hinge-1 from the resultant protein. These three variants affecting hinge-1 indicate that this domain does not mediate cellular functions that, when deficientresult in embryonic lethality in males and that germline truncating variants in this region of FLNA can result in viable phenotypes in males.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.391
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part ASame topicRNA regulation and diseaseFrench-language works237,207