MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract B013: Deep learning-based prediction of synthetic essentialities in <i>CTNNB1</i>-mutated hepatocellular carcinoma

2024· article· en· W4399504458 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tyler M. Yasaka, Michael Kasper, Li‐Ju Wang, Michael Ning, Yufei Huang, Satdarshan P. Monga, Yu‐Chiao Chiu

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneHepatocellular carcinomaContext (archaeology)Computational biologyBiologySynthetic lethalityBioinformaticsGeneticsDNA repair

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Synthetic essentiality represents a promising therapeutic approach by identifying genes that are necessary for the proliferation and survival of tumors harboring hard-to-target gene alterations. Understanding and accurately predicting synthetic essential genes, through genetic dependencies, may reveal therapeutically effective drug targets in a specific molecular context. Deep learning, as exemplified by our published DeepDEP model, has the potential to capture intricate multi-omic profiles for such prediction tasks. However, the validity of such tools in specific biological contexts remains to be fully examined and presents a major obstacle to adoption by researchers. Materials and Methods: To address this gap, we conducted a case study in which we screened for synthetic essential genes for one of the most frequently mutated and yet undruggable genes, CTNNB1, in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Specifically, we predicted the genetic dependencies of each HCC patient in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA; n=346) by DeepDEP and identified potential dependencies that were intensified with the presence of CTNNB1 mutations. The top 10 genes, ranked by p-value of differential gene-effect scores for CTNNB1-mutated (n=92) versus CTNNB1-WT HCC (n=254), were reviewed in the literature to validate their essentiality in CTNNB1-mutated HCC as well as their potential for pharmacologic inhibition. Survival analysis was performed using published data from the IMBrave150 trial to validate one of the findings. Results: Experimental evidence in the literature supported the essentiality of many of the top 10 predicted genes for CTNNB1-mutated HCC, including one gene with mechanistic evidence of being a transcriptional co-activator of β-catenin target genes. Furthermore, several of these genes have known pharmacologic inhibitors which are either natural compounds or FDA-approved drugs. One example was PDGFB, which encodes a ligand activating the PDGF signaling pathway. PDGF signaling is targeted by sorafenib, an FDA-approved first line drug for HCC. Survival analysis of the sorafenib-treated arm of the IMBrave150 trial showed that patients with mutated CTNNB1 had improved progression-free survival compared to those with wild-type CTNNB1 (p = 0.044). Conclusions: Our study illustrates a potential application of deep learning to identify synthetic essential genes, including genes with readily available pharmacologic inhibitors, for targeting challenging gene alterations. Remarkably, our tool demonstrates the ability to predict cancer dependencies with molecular subtype specificity, suggesting a potential for in silico screening of gene dependencies to facilitate drug discovery and personalized medicine approaches. Our current efforts are focused on optimizing this computational pipeline and making it publicly available for cancer researchers. Citation Format: Tyler M. Yasaka, Michael Kasper, Li-Ju Wang, Michael Ning, Yufei Huang, Satdarshan P Monga, Yu-Chiao Chiu. Deep learning-based prediction of synthetic essentialities in CTNNB1-mutated hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Expanding and Translating Cancer Synthetic Vulnerabilities; 2024 Jun 10-13; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(6 Suppl):Abstract nr B013.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksFrench-language works237,207