MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Abstract IA012: Generation and Mining of a Pediatric-focused Cancer Cell Line Atlas to Define Druggable Genetic Interactions in Childhood Malignancies

2024· article· en· W4399505265 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ron Firestein

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cancer Therapeutics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeuroblastoma Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDruggabilityPediatric cancerCancerMedicineComputational biologyBioinformaticsCancer cell linesCRISPRCancer researchBiologyCancer cellGeneticsGeneInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Pediatric solid and central nervous system tumors are the primary cause of cancer-related fatalities in children. Discovering novel targeted therapies requires utilizing pediatric cancer models that accurately mirror the patient's illness. However, the creation and evaluation of these models have significantly trailed adult cancer research, emphasizing the pressing demand for pediatric-centric cell line repositories. Here, we establish a centralized collection of over 450 childhood cancer cell lines. We subjected over 250 of these cell lines to comprehensive multi-omics analyses (including DNA sequencing, RNA sequencing, and DNA methylation analysis), while concurrently conducting pharmacological screenings and genetic CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function assays to unveil pediatric-specific treatment avenues and biomarkers. Machine learning approaches were then applied to uncover genotype-phenotype relationships and synthetic lethal interactions. Our endeavor sheds light on the specific vulnerabilities of pathways in molecularly characterized pediatric tumor subclasses and reveals clinically relevant therapeutic opportunities linked with biomarkers. We offer access to the cell line data and resources through an open-access portal. Citation Format: Ron Firestein. Generation and Mining of a Pediatric-focused Cancer Cell Line Atlas to Define Druggable Genetic Interactions in Childhood Malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Expanding and Translating Cancer Synthetic Vulnerabilities; 2024 Jun 10-13; Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(6 Suppl):Abstract nr IA012.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.576

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Cancer TherapeuticsSame topicNeuroblastoma Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207