A Review and Analysis of GAN-Based Super-Resolution Approaches for INSAT 3D/3DR Satellite Imagery using Artificial Intelligence
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Indian National Satellite System (INSAT)-3D/3DR is a geostationary satellite that is used for meteorological applications in the Indian region. Geostationary satellites have significant spatial coverage and good temporal resolution that help to monitor the evolution and propagation of meteorological systems. Meteorologists use satellite images to observe the locations of severe weather and understand the physical processes involved in the system. Image Super-Resolution (SR) aims to convert low-resolution images into high-resolution images while maintaining image quality. The SR techniques will improve the visualization of convective systems and tropical cyclones, facilitating accurate location-based warnings. This paper presents a comparative comparison of computer models for converting Low-Resolution (LR)(INSAT)-3D/3DR images into super-resolution images. This study also discusses and investigates the various Generative Adversarial Network (GAN)-based models, including the Super Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (SRGAN), Enhanced Super Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (ESRGAN), and Real Enhanced Super Resolution Generative Adversarial Network (Real-ESRGAN). The findings are compared to established approaches such as Bicubic Interpolation and Super-Resolution Convolution Neural Network (SRCNN). This study demonstrates that Real-ESRGAN performs better on weather satellite images than other cutting-edge approaches.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it