A Literacy Program in Increasing of Reading Interest and Children Creativity at Tempurejo Village by Collaborative KKN 045 Jember
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Collaborative Real Work Lecture Program (KKN-K) is a form of activity carried out to provide students with learning experiences in social life so that they can help local communities and villages. The KKN-K activities carried out by KKN-K 045 students have a literacy theme called 'Gemilang' or the Inspiring Reading Movement and Brilliant Literacy. The aim of establishing Gemilang activities is to increase interest in reading and foster creativity for the children of Tempurejo Village. This literacy activity was carried out in three places, namely MI Miftahul Ulum, Al-Muna Civilization House, and TPQ Izzatul Qur'an, Tempurejo Village, Jember Regency. The method used during the activity was field observation. Through literacy development activities for the children of Tempurejo Village, especially kindergarten and elementary school age, it is hoped that this will increase their interest in reading and develop children's creativity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".