Teleost <i>Hox</i> code defines regional identities competent for the formation of dorsal and anal fins
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The dorsal and anal fins can vary widely in position and length along the anterior–posterior axis in teleost fishes. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the diversification of these fins remain unknown. Here, we used genetic approaches in zebrafish and medaka, in which the relative positions of the dorsal and anal fins are opposite, to demonstrate the crucial role of hox genes in the patterning of the teleost posterior body, including the dorsal and anal fins. By the CRISPR-Cas9-induced frameshift mutations and positional cloning of spontaneous dorsalfinless medaka, we show that various hox mutants exhibit the absence of dorsal or anal fins, or a stepwise posterior extension of these fins, with vertebral abnormalities. Our results indicate that multiple hox genes, primarily from hoxc -related clusters, encompass the regions responsible for the dorsal and anal fin formation along the anterior–posterior axis. These results further suggest that shifts in the anterior boundaries of hox expression which vary among fish species, lead to diversification in the position and size of the dorsal and anal fins, similar to how modulations in Hox expression can alter the number of anatomically distinct vertebrae in tetrapods. Furthermore, we show that hox genes responsible for dorsal fin formation are different between zebrafish and medaka. Our results suggest that a novel mechanism has occurred during teleost evolution, in which the gene network responsible for fin formation might have switched to the regulation downstream of other hox genes, leading to the remarkable diversity in the dorsal fin position.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".