Lattice match between coexisting cubic and tetragonal phases in PMN-PT at the phase transition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
(1−x)Pb(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3-xPbTiO3 (PMN-PT) perovskite-like solid solutions are recognized for their outstanding electromechanical properties, which are of technological importance. However, some significant aspects of the crystal structures and domain assemblages in this system and the role of these characteristics in defining the functional performance of PMN-PT remain uncertain. Here, we used synchrotron x-ray diffraction to investigate the phase transition linking the paraelectric (cubic) and ferroelectric (tetragonal) phases in a single crystal of 0.65PMN-0.35PT. We analyzed the evolution of reciprocal-space maps across this transition. These maps were collected using small temperature step (1 K) and a high reciprocal-space resolution to reveal changes in the splitting of Bragg peaks caused by the formation of ferroelastic domains in the low-symmetry phase. Our results uncovered a two-phase state, cubic plus tetragonal phases, which exists over a narrow temperature range of only ≈4 K and exhibits a thermal hysteresis of ≈1.8 K. Remarkably, within this state, the lattice parameter of the cubic phase, aC, matches the orientational average of the lattice parameters for the tetragonal polymorph, 23aT+13cT. We discuss the implications of this matching, highlighting the possibility of it being realized by the formation of an assemblage of tetragonal twin domains separated from the cubic phase by a strain-free {110} boundary, as in the “adaptive phase” but without domain miniaturization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".