MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399555314 · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2024.107687

Integration of white mica in situ 87Rb/87Sr with in situ and step-heat 40Ar/39Ar dates in orogenic settings

2024· article· en· W4399555314 on OpenAlexafffund
Dawn A. Kellett, Kyle P. Larson, D R Skipton

Bibliographic record

VenueLithos · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsYukon UniversityOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusUniversity of British ColumbiaGeological Survey of Canada
FundersNatural Resources Canada
KeywordsMicaIn situGeologyGeochemistryMineralogyPaleontologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

White mica is common in continental rocks, and often (de)forms in response to structural and metamorphic processes in orogenic settings. It has been most typically dated via step heat or in situ 40 Ar/ 39 Ar methods. However, with in situ 87 Rb/ 87 Sr geochronology now possible via in line mass-chemical-mass filtering of Rb and Sr isotopes in tandem mass spectrometers, the contrasting accumulation of radiogenic Ar vs. Sr in white mica under deformation and metamorphism should allow for more nuanced and improved interpretations of the geological evolution of white mica. Here, we apply the in situ 87 Rb/ 87 Sr dating method to white mica previously dated with the in situ and step heat 40 Ar/ 39 Ar methods in three case studies with contrasting structural and metamorphic histories. The results of these comparative studies are used to propose a framework for interpreting paired white mica 40 Ar/ 39 Ar and 87 Rb/ 87 Sr datasets. In general, white mica 87 Rb/ 87 Sr ages are expected to be equivalent to 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages under conditions of low temperature metamorphic, fluid-mediated, or dynamic (re-) crystallization. Under high temperature conditions of igneous or metamorphic white mica (re-)crystallization, 87 Rb/ 87 Sr ages are more likely to represent the (re-)crystallization event, with 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages representing post-crystallization cooling. Deformation and/or dynamic (re-)crystallization of white mica can produce complex, spatially controlled age patterns for both chronometers, requiring more nuanced interpretations. These results and framework point to the value of combining both chronometers in orogenic studies to reduce uncertainties in interpretation and test assumptions in dating metamorphic and deformation processes in orogens. • In situ 87 Rb/ 87 Sr white mica dating provides distinct information from 40 Ar/ 39 Ar white mica dating. • Combining these data can be used to resolve orogenic processes such as metamorphism, deformation and metasomatism. • We present a framework for interpreting the geological significance of 87 Rb/ 87 Sr vs. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age patterns in white mica.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.143
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLithosSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207