MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Transformation of the ancient myth in Margaret Atwood's novel "Penelopiad"

2023· article· en· W4399557692 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Olha YEFREMOVA

Bibliographic record

VenueVìsnik Marìupolʹsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu Serìâ Fìlologìâ · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShort Stories in Global Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMythologyNarrativeHEROTheme (computing)LiteratureContext (archaeology)Meaning (existential)Character (mathematics)HistoryWifeArtStyle (visual arts)Motif (music)Identity (music)AestheticsPhilosophyTheologyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article discusses the work of Margaret Atwood, one of Canada's most prominent contemporary writers, with a particular focus on her exploration of the female theme in her literature. Atwood is known for her interest in issues related to women's self-identification, their presence in society and culture, their priorities, desires, and claims, with a central theme being the secondary status of women compared to men. The article delves into Atwood's novel "The Penelopiad," published in 2005, which reimagines and transforms the ancient myth of Penelope and Odysseus in a new narrative context. It explores how Atwood uses the ancient myth, expanding and altering its content and meaning, to create a qualitatively new female version of well-known events, distinct from the canonical male culture represented by Homer. The novel "The Penelopiad" places the female character, Penelope, at its center. In European culture, Penelope has traditionally been perceived as the faithful wife of a great hero, as clever as her husband. This tradition of defining Penelope through her connection to Odysseus dates back to antiquity. However, Margaret Atwood challenges this tradition by giving Penelope her voice. The author offers readers a unique opportunity to hear Penelope's story "from the horse's mouth," a narrative told with irony that demythologizes the image of the great wanderer. The novel begins with a somewhat ironic tone, drawing readers into a deep monologue with the main character. Notably, the style of the narrative is sarcastically simple and primitive, emphasizing the significant contrast with the original myth of Odysseus, which is filled with complex language, numerous epithets, and comparisons. The use of parody, a humorous genre, gives the narrative its own plot, composition, imagery, and stylistic features. The title of the novel, "The Penelopiad," itself highlights the contrast with Homer's "The Odyssey." By replacing the male name of the great hero with Penelope's female name, Atwood brings the wife of the hero to the forefront of the story. This powerful feminist technique places Penelope on an equal footing with Odysseus, and both stories are intertwined to the point that it becomes impossible to determine which one holds more significance. In contrast to "The Odyssey," "The Penelopiad" should have been a story of a woman's journey. However, such a story would hardly have been possible in a patriarchal society where a woman's place has always been in the household, beside her children and husband, engaged in the mundane chores of running a household. The journey undertaken by the protagonist is symbolic, representing a journey into her own self, self-discovery, and a quest to uncover historical roots and fulfill her genuine desires. Atwood reinterprets the trivial stories about Penelope in a feminist context, portraying them as an attempt by a patriarchal society to belittle women and absolve the truly guilty men. Overall, the article provides an insightful analysis of Margaret Atwood's use of mythology and feminist perspectives in her novel "The Penelopiad." Atwood's work challenges traditional narratives and offers a fresh interpretation of well-known stories from a female point of view, shedding light on the complexities of gender dynamics and power structures in literature and society. Key words: Margaret Atwood, Penelopiad, ancient Greek myth, transformation, history, feminism

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.150

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0190.016
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVìsnik Marìupolʹsʹkogo deržavnogo unìversitetu Serìâ FìlologìâSame topicShort Stories in Global LiteratureFrench-language works237,207