Nomogram established on account of Lasso-logistic regression for predicting hemorrhagic transformation in patients with acute ischemic stroke after endovascular thrombectomy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a common and serious complication in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This study was performed to determine the predictive factors associated with HT in stroke patients with EVT and to establish and validate a nomogram that combines with independent predictors to predict the probability of HT after EVT in patients with AIS. METHODS: All patients were randomly divided into development and validation cohorts at a ratio of 7:3. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to select the optimal factors, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to build a clinical prediction model. Calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA) and receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were generated to assess predictive performance. RESULTS: LASSO regression analysis showed that Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scores (ASPECTS), international normalized ratio (INR), uric acid (UA), neutrophils (NEU) were the influencing factors for AIS with HT after EVT. A novel prognostic nomogram model was established to predict the possibility of HT with AIS after EVT. The calibration curve showed that the model had good consistency. The results of ROC analysis showed that the AUC of the prediction model established in this study for predicting HT was 0.797 in the development cohort and 0.786 in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: This study proposes a novel and practical nomogram based on ASPECTS, INR, UA, NEU, which can well predict the probability of HT after EVT in patients with AIS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".