Intimacy and sexual functioning after cancer: The intersection with psychological flexibility
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cancer significantly impacts overall satisfaction with life (SWL). Psychological flexibility (PF) involves adapting to situational demands, balancing life demands, and committing to value-aligned behaviours, which can help survivors manage cancer-related distress. Given the lack of research examining how PF affects relationship and sexual satisfaction, our purpose was to elucidate the relationship between variables associated with partner intimacy, pillars of PF, and variables related to psychological wellness. We explored relationships between SWL and the pillars of PF (Valued Action, Behavioural Awareness, Openness to Experience) as mediating factors in the association between relationship and sexual satisfaction and SWL. Participants (113 male, 106 female) completed questionnaires measuring sexual function, intimacy, relationship and sexual satisfaction, PF, SWL, anxiety, and depression. Results indicated an equal percentage (57.5%) of males and females reported sexual dysfunction; however, varied patterns of relationships emerged between the sexes. There were significant relationships between SWL and relationship and sexual satisfaction. The mediation analyses showed that valued action and openness to experience partially mediated the relationship between relationship satisfaction and SWL. Interestingly, Valued Action was the only pillar of PF that emerged as a partial mediator between sexual satisfaction and SWL. Thus, value-aligned behaviours may be a key focus for intervention in cancer survivors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".