Beamion LUNG-2: A phase III randomized controlled trial of zongertinib (BI 1810631) versus standard of care (SoC) in patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring <i>HER2</i> tyrosine kinase domain (TKD) mutations.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
TPS8654 Background: HER2mutations are present in 2–4% of NSCLC tumors, and ~50% occur in the TKD. First-line SoC for patients with HER2mutation-positive (m+) NSCLC is platinum-based chemotherapy ± immunotherapy; however, no targeted first-line treatment has been approved. Zongertinib is a HER2-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that binds to both wild-type and mutated HER2 but spares EGFR. In a Phase Ia trial in 53 pre-treated patients with HER2 aberration-positive solid tumors, zongertinib conferred an objective response (OR)/disease control rate (DCR) of 49/91% and an OR/DCR of 58/97% in those patients with HER2m+ NSCLC (n=36), with manageable safety with few EGFR-associated toxicities (Beamion LUNG-1; NCT04886804). Here, we describe Beamion LUNG-2 (NCT06151574), a Phase III, randomized, active-controlled, open-label trial designed to assess the efficacy of first-line zongertinib versus SoC in patients with HER2m+, locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC. Methods: Approximately 270 patients from ~160 sites across 30 countries will be randomized 1:1 to receive either zongertinib or SoC and stratified by the presence of the A775_G77insYVMA HER2 mutation. In the experimental treatment arm, patients will receive 120 mg oral zongertinib once-daily in 21-day cycles. In the comparator treatment arm, patients will receive 500 mg/m2 intravenous pemetrexed chemotherapy, plus either 75 mg/m2 cisplatin or Area Under the Curve 5 carboplatin, plus 200 mg pembrolizumab on Day 1 once every 3 weeks (q3w) for four 21-day cycles, then maintenance with 500 mg/m2 pemetrexed plus 200 mg pembrolizumab q3w for up to 35 cycles. Treatment in both arms will continue until progressive disease (PD; RECIST 1.1), undue toxicity, or other criteria are met. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (RECIST 1.1), by blinded central independent review. Secondary endpoints include OR (defined as best overall response of complete or partial response, RECIST 1.1); patient-reported outcomes analysed as changes from baseline to Week 25; overall survival and occurrence of adverse events (CTCAE version 5.0). Key inclusion criteria are histologically or cytologically diagnosed advanced and/or metastatic non-squamous NSCLC; ≥1 measurable lesion (RECIST 1.1); no prior systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic disease; a documented HER2 TKD mutation; and eligibility to receive the selected SoC. Key exclusion criteria are tumors with targetable alterations with an available treatment; presence/history of uncontrolled/symptomatic leptomeningeal disease; and radiotherapy or major surgery ≤4 weeks prior to randomization. Clinical trial information: NCT06151574 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".