MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399592499 · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2024.101136

The impact of non-pharmaceutical COVID-19 interventions on collisions, traffic injuries and fatalities across Québec

2024· article· en· W4399592499 on OpenAlexafffundabout
José Ignacio Nazif‐Muñoz, Brice Batomen, Thomas G. Brown, Camila Corrêa Matias Pereira, Marie‐Soleil Cloutier, Claude Giroux, Asma Mamri, Vahid Najafi Moghaddam Gilani, Marie Claude Ouimet, Cynthia Paquet, Joël Tremblay, Émilie Turmel, Ward Vanlaar

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic and Road Safety
Canadian institutionsTraffic Injury Research FoundationQuebec Automobile Insurance CorporationUniversity of TorontoUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)Psychological interventionPandemicMedical emergencyBusinessMedicineVirologyPsychiatryInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The association between non-pharmaceutical COVID-19 (NP-COVID-19) interventions, which aimed to regulate public behaviour to curb the spread of COVID-19, and road safety has become an important area of research to explore the unintended consequences of this pandemic. This study focuses on the 17 regions of the province of Quebec in Canada to assess the relation of NP-COVID-19 interventions on collisions, light and severe injuries, and traffic fatalities. Interrupted time-series analyses were conducted from 2015 to 2022, using daily traffic fatality and injury data per 100 000 population. A COVID-19 NP interventions index for Québec (QCnPI-Index) was created based on 58 interventions implemented from March 2020 to June 2022 in each region. Multiple controls commonly used in the road safety literature, such as weather conditions and seasonal patterns, were applied. The association between the QCnPI-Index and the four outcomes was mixed. First, the QCnPI-Index was associated with considerable reductions for collisions and light injuries in all regions. Significant reductions in severe injuries were linked to the index across six regions: Montérégie, Laurentides, Lanaudière, Laval, Outaouais and Montréal. No concomitant changes were observed in traffic fatalities across any region. Findings underscore the complex relationship between NP-COVID-19 interventions and road safety, emphasizing the need for more comprehensive efforts to understand their diverse effects. Further investigation is warranted to comprehend the discrepancy in the reduction of injuries and collisions compared to fatalities. This study ultimately highlights the importance of continuing exploring in future research additional factors, such as road safety interventions during COVID-19 periods, and concentrating on pedestrians and cyclists, to better understand the impact of NP-COVID-19 interventions on other road safety dimensions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.489
Teacher spread0.418 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesSame topicTraffic and Road SafetyFrench-language works237,207