Effect of Asystasia spp. Management on the O×G Hybrid (Elaeis oleifera × Elaeis guineensis) of Oil Palm at the Adult Stage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The proper management of weeds plays an important role in nutrition and health and, therefore, in the yield and sustainability of the oil palm crop. To evaluate the effect of Asystasia spp. management as a cover species in the interspecific hybrid O×G oil palm at the adult stage, a trial was established in the Luker Agrícola plantation (Casanare, Colombia). The treatments evaluated corresponded to four types of management of Asystasia spp. with different control radii concerning the stipe (drip line) (1, 3, and 4.5 m on three occasions during the year) on an O×G Coari × La Mé cultivar at the adult stage (2011 planting). The treatments were established under a randomized complete block design with four replications. The analysis of the results obtained after four years of evaluation indicated that there are no significant differences between the treatments evaluated in terms of soil chemistry, nutrition, growth, and crop yield by analysis of variance. Nonetheless, significant differences were observed in soil cover variables and biomass and nutrient accumulation according to Tukey’s test at 5%. According to the results obtained, the management of Asystasia spp. should be focused on the conservation and efficient use of resources. It should be adapted according to the most appropriate management conditions in each case (age of the crop, weeds desired by the plantation, pests, nutrient recycling, soil moisture conservation, among others).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".