Analytic delay distributions for a family of gene transcription models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Models intended to describe the time evolution of a gene network must somehow include transcription, the DNA-templated synthesis of RNA, and translation, the RNA-templated synthesis of proteins. In eukaryotes, the DNA template for transcription can be very long, often consisting of tens of thousands of nucleotides, and lengthy pauses may punctuate this process. Accordingly, transcription can last for many minutes, in some cases hours. There is a long history of introducing delays in gene expression models to take the transcription and translation times into account. Here we study a family of detailed transcription models that includes initiation, elongation, and termination reactions. We establish a framework for computing the distribution of transcription times, and work out these distributions for some typical cases. For elongation, a fixed delay is a good model provided elongation is fast compared to initiation and termination, and there are no sites where long pauses occur. The initiation and termination phases of the model then generate a nontrivial delay distribution, and elongation shifts this distribution by an amount corresponding to the elongation delay. When initiation and termination are relatively fast, the distribution of elongation times can be approximated by a Gaussian. A convolution of this Gaussian with the initiation and termination time distributions gives another analytic approximation to the transcription time distribution. If there are long pauses during elongation, because of the modularity of the family of models considered, the elongation phase can be partitioned into reactions generating a simple delay (elongation through regions where there are no long pauses), and reactions whose distribution of waiting times must be considered explicitly (initiation, termination, and motion through regions where long pauses are likely). In these cases, the distribution of transcription times again involves a nontrivial part and a shift due to fast elongation processes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".