Study on Utilizing Mask R-CNN for Phenotypic Estimation of Lettuce’s Growth Status and Optimal Harvest Timing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lettuce is an annual plant of the family Asteraceae. It is most often grown as a leaf vegetable, but sometimes for its stem and seeds, and its growth status and quality are evaluated based on its morphological phenotypic traits. However, traditional measurement methods are often labor-intensive and time-consuming due to manual measurements and may result in less accuracy. In this study, we proposed a new method utilizing RGB images and Mask R-Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for estimating lettuce critical phenotypic traits. Leveraging publicly available datasets, we employed an improved Mask R-CNN model to perform a phenotypic analysis of lettuce images. This allowed us to estimate five phenotypic traits simultaneously, which include fresh weight, dry weight, plant height, canopy diameter, and leaf area. The enhanced Mask R-CNN model involved two key aspects: (1) replacing the backbone network from ResNet to RepVGG to enhance computational efficiency and performance; (2) adding phenotypic branches and constructing a multi-task regression model to achieve end-to-end estimation of lettuce phenotypic traits. Experimental results demonstrated that the present method achieved high accuracy and stable results in lettuce image segmentation, detection, and phenotypic estimation tasks, with APs for detection and segmentation being 0.8684 and 0.8803, respectively. Additionally, the R2 values for the five phenotypic traits are 0.96, 0.9596, 0.9329, 0.9136, and 0.9592, with corresponding mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) of 0.1072, 0.1522, 0.0757, 0.0548, and 0.0899, respectively. This study presents a novel technical advancement based on digital knowledge for phenotypic analysis and evaluation of lettuce quality, which could lay the foundation for artificial intelligence expiation in fresh vegetable production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".