MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399610548 · doi:10.55885/jerp.v3i3.303

The Influence of Animation Videos on Expressive Language Skills in Preschool Kobar Anugerah, Batujala Village, Bontoramba District, Jeneponto Regency

2023· article· en· W4399610548 on OpenAlexaff
M Syamsidar., Herlina Herlina, Muhammad Akil Musi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Education Review Provision · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLanguage Acquisition and Education
Canadian institutionsEducation and Early Childhood Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimationPsychologyComputer scienceComputer graphics (images)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research aims to: 1) find out what the effect is after being given an animated video at the Kobar Anugrah Early Childhood Education in Batujala Village. 2) To find out what the influence was before being given an animated video at the Kobar Anugrah Early Childhood Education in Batujal Village. 3) To find out whether there is an influence of learning videos in Kobar Anugrah Early Childhood Education in Batujala Village. This research is a quantitative descriptive research by describing variables that support the data in the form of numbers generated from the actual situation. This research uses primary data which collects data using questionnaires and interviews. The researcher uses quantitative analysis, multiple linear regression analysis and analysis of the coefficient of determination. with the help of SPSS17. The population in this study was 47 early childhood children at the Kobar Anugrah Early Childhood Education School, Batujala Village, carried out on May 15 2023 at Kobar early childhood education in Batujala Village, Bontoramba District, Jeneponto Regency, South Sulawesi Province. The results of the research obtained using the Animated videos have the effect of helping young children be active in expressive language at early childhood education schools in Kobar, and teachers are also more active in the early childhood education learning process using animated digital media learning methods. And master digital media materials with animated video materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.354 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Education Review ProvisionSame topicLanguage Acquisition and EducationFrench-language works237,207