Investigating the utility of HR-pQCT for the assessment of joint space and bone mineral density in hand osteoarthritis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osteoarthritis affects joints of the hand and is radiographically characterized by joint space narrowing and changes in volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD). High-resolution peripheral computed tomography (HR-pQCT) allows for three-dimensional analysis of joint space width (JSW) changes but has yet to be applied to hand OA (HOA). The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of HR-pQCT in quantifying JSW and vBMD changes in HOA. The 2nd and 3rd distal interphalangeal (DIP2, DIP3) and trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joints of 20 women (10 controls, 10 HOA) were scanned using HR-pQCT. The Diseases of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire and the Jebsen Hand Function Test (JHFT) were obtained. Radiographs were scored using the Eaton-Littler classification. We assessed between-group differences in HR-pQCT outcomes, and relationships between HR-pQCT outcomes and patient and radiographic characteristics. JSW maximum (JSW.Max) was higher in OA patients in the DIP2 (OA median [interquartile rage]: 2.07 mm [1.90–2.18], controls: 1.88 mm [1.84–1.89]) and DIP3 joints (OA: 2.01 mm [1.89–2.24], controls: 1.86 mm [1.82–1.95]). DIP3 JS volume was higher in OA (30.36 mm3, 19.35–34.57 mm3, controls: 17.05 mm3, 15.53–18.52 mm3). DASH scores were positively associated with DIP2 JSW asymmetry (JSW.AS), and JHFT times were positively associated with DIP3 JSW.Max, JSW.AS, and proximal DIP2 vBMD. Worsening radiographic TMC OA was associated with first metacarpal vBMD, JSW minimum, JSW.Max, and JSW.AS. These preliminary findings suggest that HR-pQCT may be useful in investigating JS changes in HOA and warrants further investigation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".