MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399627381 · doi:10.1097/jpo.0000000000000512

Metatarsalgia: Clinical Profile and Comfort from Foot Orthoses Treatment

2024· article· en· W4399627381 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kelly A. Robb, Michael Ryan

Bibliographic record

VenueJPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFoot and Ankle Surgery
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetatarsalgiaFoot (prosody)Foot OrthosesPhysical medicine and rehabilitationMedicinePhysical therapyForefootSurgeryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Introduction The biomechanical factors influencing metatarsalgia etiology have been well documented; however, patient characteristics of individuals suffering from this condition and the effectiveness of foot orthosis therapy remain unknown. Objectives The objectives of this study were 1) to characterize the metatarsalgia profile of patients seeking treatment in a footwear and orthotic clinic, and 2) to explore the association between comfort and pain in patients with metatarsalgia who were treated with foot orthosis intervention. Study Design This study is a retrospective chart review. Methods Metatarsalgia assessment and follow-up data (case group n = 2137) were extracted from a research database (control group n = 82,822) from patients visiting a private foot care clinic. A clinical assessment was performed by a Canadian-certified pedorthist, and footwear recommendations and bilateral custom foot orthoses were provided to all patients. Feet were casted using a three-dimensional volumetric laser scanner. Orthoses (80% of cases) were manufactured from a direct mill polypropylene shell; additional rearfoot, forefoot postings, and/or metatarsal support was added according to the patient’s personalized treatment plan. Results Eighty-one percent (81%) of metatarsalgia patients reported symptom improvement following custom orthoses treatment. The average pain reduction from the orthotic intervention was 58.55%. The average self-reported comfort scores were 7.7 ± 2.2/10 at follow-up. Compared with our control group, patients with metatarsalgia were more frequently self-identified as females, over 51 years of age, and the condition was observed in a higher prevalence of high cavus feet. Conclusions Our results suggest that a pes cavus foot posture is a biomechanical risk factor to the development of metatarsalgia. Custom foot orthoses that are manufactured according to a patient’s personalized treatment plan are an effective conservative treatment option for pain reduction in patients suffering from metatarsalgia. Clinical Relevance Statement Foot orthoses are an effective conservative treatment option for pain reduction in metatarsalgia patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.688
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJPO Journal of Prosthetics and OrthoticsSame topicFoot and Ankle SurgeryFrench-language works237,207