MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Molecular predictors and mechanisms of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis: A case-control study with translational correlates.

2024· article· en· W4399627762 on OpenAlexaffabout
Steph A. Pang, Manuel Flores Molina, Paméla Thébault, Yuming Zheng, Hsiang Chou, Christophe Gonçalves, Jingtao Wang, Sabin Filimon, Paulo Nunes Filho, Mariana Pilon Capella, Khashayar Esfahani, Caroline Michel, Jun Ding, Sonia V. del Rincón, Marie Hudson, Réjean Lapointe, Wilson H. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)McGill University Health CentreCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMyocarditisImmune systemImmune checkpointTranslational researchInternal medicineCancer researchImmunologyOncologyImmunotherapyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

12031 Background: Myocarditis from immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) has been reported in 0.04-1.14% of patients on ICI, with mortality up to 50%. Self-antigens driving ICI-myocarditis are largely unknown. Shared T cell clones between heart and tumor have not yet been identified. We present the Montreal Immune-Related Adverse Events (MIRAE) myocarditis project, which seeks to elucidate cellular and molecular drivers of ICI-myocarditis. Methods: Our case-control study comprises 3 groups of patients on ICI: 1) ICI-myocarditis (per ASCO diagnostic criteria); 2) non-ICI troponemia (elevated troponins from non-immune etiology); and 3) controls matched by tumor type, sex, and age, with no troponemia. We analyzed blood from prior to ICI, at time of troponemia, or at 3-6 months after ICI initiation. Our multiomics pipeline spans cytokine profiling, immune cell subpopulation profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) via single cell RNA and T/B cell receptor sequencing, spatial single-cell imaging proteomics, and spatial transcriptomics to localize sources of upregulated cytokines and to visualize cell-cell interactions. Results: Of 560 patients treated with ICI in our biobank, 4.3% had ICI-myocarditis. 19 myocarditis stored samples were included in our study. All 19 patients received steroids. Additional treatments were mycophenolate (32%), tofacitinib (21%), plasmapheresis (21%), IVIG (21%) and alemtuzumab (5%). 5 patients (26%) developed arrhythmias. 10 (47%) had concurrent irAE. There were no major cardiac adverse events nor deaths from myocarditis or other irAE. These encouraging results may reflect our hospital protocol of troponin screening during first 3 cycles of ICI, leading to earlier diagnosis and treatment. Elevations of blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, alanine transaminase, and aspartate aminotransferase were associated with ICI-myocarditis. Plasma cytokine profiling of 13 ICI-myocarditis cases and controls revealed significant elevations of IP10, IL10, IL15 and IL13 at time of myocarditis. Subpopulation profiling of PBMCs is ongoing. Spatial phenotyping of an ICI-myocarditis biopsy demonstrated T cell and macrophage infiltration among cardiocytes and granulocyte accumulation within fibrotic tissue. Spatial transcriptomics analysis is ongoing for the ICI-myocarditis biopsy and 2 controls. Conclusions: This is one of the largest translational studies of ICI-myocarditis and controls. Our patients had improved clinical outcomes compared to those reported in the literature, which may be a result from our early screening. Our multiomics analyses of their biospecimens contributes novel data, such as spatial proteomics and transcriptomics analyses on heart tissue. Advancing our understanding of ICI-myocarditis will allow us to design screening strategies and more targeted treatments for ICI-myocarditis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers→French-language works237,207→