Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rapid realistic routing on multimodal transport networks (walk, bike, public transport and car) using 'R5', the Rapid Realistic Routing on Real-world and Reimagined networks engine <<a href="https://github.com/conveyal/r5" target="_top">https://github.com/conveyal/r5</a>>. The package allows users to generate detailed routing analysis or calculate travel time and monetary cost matrices using seamless parallel computing on top of the R5 Java machine. While R5 is developed by Conveyal, the package r5r is independently developed by a team at the Institute for Applied Economic Research (Ipea) with contributions from collaborators. Apart from the documentation in this package, users will find additional information on R5 documentation at <<a href="https://docs.conveyal.com/" target="_top">https://docs.conveyal.com/</a>>. Although we try to keep new releases of r5r in synchrony with R5, the development of R5 follows Conveyal's independent update process. Hence, users should confirm the R5 version implied by the Conveyal user manual (see <<a href="https://docs.conveyal.com/changelog" target="_top">https://docs.conveyal.com/changelog</a>>) corresponds with the R5 version that r5r depends on. This version of r5r depends on R5 v7.1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it