MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399637914 · doi:10.56687/9781447365723-002

Notes on contributors

2024· book-chapter· en· W4399637914 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenuePolicy Press eBooks · 2024
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHuman auditory perception and evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEconomic and Social Research CouncilUniversity of AlbertaAGE-WELL
KeywordsGeographyHistoryComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linnéa Aldman holds a Master's degree in Political Science and has extensive experience of carrying out evaluations, assessments and pilot studies within different contexts, such as human rights, gender equality and the empowerment of seldom-heard groups (for example, people with migration, refugee and asylum-seeking experiences).She currently works at the Swedish Family Care Competence Centre (SFCCC/ Nka), where she takes part in carrying out literature reviews and report writing on a range of carers' topics, including carer support and carer leave policies.Camille Allard is research fellow in Sociology at the University of Milan.Her research interests include unpaid care, care ethics, inequalities at work and their impact on workers' health and well-being.Her current research examines how organisations make decisions to invest in health and wellbeing promotion for their employees.Jacquie Eales, as Research Manager of Research on Aging, Policies and Practice (RAPP) in the Department of Human Ecology at the University of Alberta for nearly three decades, bridges research, policy and practice to make a meaningful difference in the lives of older adults and their family caregivers.Jacquie successfully implements transdisciplinary research projects, working collaboratively with an array of valued partners to ensure research projects are relevant to their needs and mentoring graduate students in the process.She has co-authored numerous academic articles, book chapters and conference papers, including two Top 5 published articles and one Editors' Choice journal article.She is passionate about translating research knowledge into useful formats to facilitate its uptake by policy, practice and community partners.She makes a meaningful difference in her community by serving on the Age-Friendly Edmonton Leadership Table and the Board of Directors of GEF Seniors Housing (2016-22), by championing the Cycling Without Age grassroots programme, and by co-hosting four-generation family suppers every week.In 2022, Jacquie was nominated for a Minister of Seniors Service Award for her outstanding commitment and contribution to Alberta Seniors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.490

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6570.551

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venuePolicy Press eBooksSame topicHuman auditory perception and evaluationFrench-language works237,207