U-Pb geochronology reveals that hydrothermal dolomitization was coeval to the deposition of the Burgess Shale lagerstätte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fault-controlled, hydrothermal dolomitization often occurs at margins between shallow-water carbonate platforms and deep-water sedimentary basins. In western Canada, for example, the platform margin between the Cathedral Formation and the Burgess Shale Formation has been dolomitized at temperatures up to ~200 °C, with local magnesite, talc, and clinochlore mineralization. At the same time, the Burgess Shale Formation includes exceptional fossils that provide key evidence of the radiation of the animal phyla during the Cambrian Period (541 to 485.4 Ma). This lagerstätte and Mg-rich minerals within the adjacent and underlying strata, however, have been critically understudied. Here we show, using carbonate U-Pb geochronology, that western Canada was tectonically active and subject to hydrothermal dolomitization during the Middle Cambrian (Miaolingian Epoch) to Middle Ordovician (488.1 ± 18.8 Ma). These results extend the latest stages of rifting along the western margin of Laurentia into the Paleozoic, while also suggesting that the dolomitization of the Cathedral Formation occurred at the same time as the deposition of the Burgess Shale lagerstätte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".