MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399651904 · doi:10.3389/feart.2024.1418783

Research on the transport behavior of microparticle proppants inside natural fractures

2024· article· en· W4399651904 on OpenAlexaff
Huifeng Liu, Xiaohan Wang, Ning Xu, Zhangxin Chen, Yan Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Earth Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroparticleInflowParticle sizeHydraulic fracturingVolume (thermodynamics)Materials scienceFracture (geology)Petroleum engineeringParticle (ecology)GeologyGeotechnical engineeringChemical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a crucial exploration technique for unconventional reservoirs, hydraulic fracturing enables the formation of complex fracture networks, thereby facilitating the flow of oil and gas. The closure of natural fractures decreases stimulation performance. Microparticle proppants are used to fill natural fractures and effectively increase the stimulation area. The 100-mesh proppant conventionally used in field operations may be insufficiently small to effectively access natural fractures. In order to effectively overcome natural fractures closure, microparticle proppants (i.e., proppants with a diameter of 75 μm (200-mesh) or less) are required. The particle size threshold test of microparticle proppants placement is conducted to determine the size threshold of proppants flowing into natural fractures. The microparticle proppants placement experiment in multi-branch fractures is conducted to investigate the volume difference of proppants in different fractures. Numerical simulations are performed to model proppant transport within fractures of actual dimensions to facilitating the optimization of stimulation parameters. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Effective inflow of microparticle proppants requires a size threshold of proppants. For the 200-mesh proppants, the size should be less than half of natural fractures width when microparticle proppants effectively flow into natural fractures. (2) Sand concentration affects the size threshold of microparticle proppants. The size threshold should appropriately increase to ensure the inflow of proppant. (3) Difference of multi-branch fracture width has a significant effect on volume of microparticle proppants inside fractures. When the width ratio of multi-branch fractures exceeds 2, this effect becomes obvious. (4) Particle size has an effect on proppant placement. 200-mesh proppants can obtain uniform distribution of proppants among natural fractures. 140-mesh proppants can obtain maximum proppant volume among natural fractures. Sand concentration significantly affects proppant placement performance. The optimal sand concentration is 60kg/m 3 . The pumping rate for a single cluster fracture should not be excessively low. The pumping rate should be larger than 0.5m 3 /min and the optimal pumping rate 2m 3 /min. In this paper, the particle size and concentration of particulate proppant are optimized and the geometric characteristics of fractures are considered. These conclusions provide important practical guidance and scientific basis for the optimization and application of hydraulic fracturing technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in Earth ScienceSame topicHydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir AnalysisFrench-language works237,207