MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399656833 · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3413783

Millimeter-Wave Joint Sensing and Communication System Design for Connected Automated Vehicles

2024· article· en· W4399656833 on OpenAlexafffund
Nima Souzandeh, Mehrdad Harifi-Mood, Sonia Aı̈ssa, Serioja Ovidiu Tatu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceJoint (building)Extremely high frequencyMillimeterTelecommunicationsEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel mmWave joint radar and communication (JRC) system operating in the 24 GHz ISM band, specifically designed for automated connected vehicles. The system utilizes a single transceiver platform featuring a frequency-shift keying modulation scheme that enables simultaneous operation in the radar and communication modes. The proposed JRC system boasts several distinctive features. Firstly, its simultaneous sensing and communication capability, a departure from the conventional sequential arrangement in the time domain. Secondly, the system is characterized by its simplicity, offering ease of implementation and operation. The third feature addresses synchronization challenges through an innovative approach that eliminates the dependence on a shared clock or timing reference, enhancing the system flexibility and adaptability. Lastly, the system stands out for its cost-effectiveness. Results from simulations and experiments collectively showcase the system’s promising performance. In particular, the JRC system demonstrates robust radio communication capabilities with adjustable data rate based on the instantaneous measured Doppler frequency, while also exhibiting promising radar capabilities. This dual functionality underscores the system’s versatility and potential for practical applications in smart environments. Notably, throughout the transmission of vital information, no errors were detected in the communication mode, affirming the reliability of the system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.597

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicWireless Body Area NetworksFrench-language works237,207