Diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum using ultrasound texture feature fusion and machine learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) is an obstetric disorder arising from the abnormal adherence of the placenta to the uterine wall, often leading to life-threatening complications including postpartum hemorrhage. Despite its significance, PAS remains frequently underdiagnosed before delivery. This study delves into the realm of machine learning to enhance the precision of PAS classification. We introduce two distinct models for PAS classification employing ultrasound texture features. METHODS: The first model leverages machine learning techniques, harnessing texture features extracted from ultrasound scans. The second model adopts a linear classifier, utilizing integrated features derived from 'weighted z-scores'. A novel aspect of our approach is the amalgamation of classical machine learning and statistical-based methods for feature selection. This, coupled with a more transparent classification model based on quantitative image features, results in superior performance compared to conventional machine learning approaches. RESULTS: Our linear classifier and machine learning models attain test accuracies of 87 % and 92 %, and 5-fold cross validation accuracies of 88.7 (4.4) and 83.0 (5.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed models illustrate the effectiveness of practical and robust tools for enhanced PAS detection, offering non-invasive and computationally-efficient diagnostic tools. As adjunct methods for prenatal diagnosis, these tools can assist clinicians by reducing the need for unnecessary interventions and enabling earlier planning of management strategies for delivery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".