Retropharyngeal Abscess Presenting as Leptomeningeal Meningitis: A Diagnostic Challenge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following review article aims to identify a place of enunciation of university social responsibility (RSU) in the context of the current challenges of higher education. It is a work that takes place within the framework of a doctoral research project that seeks to analyze and problematize the perspective of social projection or the so-called RSU projects in the context of higher education in Colombia and its relationship with society. The methodology used is a part of an exploratory documentary review, which brings together documents between articles, books, papers, conferences and doctoral thesis a Latin and Ibero-American level. The development of the review allows us to identify important areas of reflection, among which are, the RSU and the modes of subjectivation evident in the line of knowledge, ethics and politics; in the same way they make visible aspects to think about the university-society relationship. In conclusion, it is evident that the vast majority of research remains endogenous, which implies the challenge of doing comparative research that focuses, among others, on reflecting on the ethos and purpose of higher education from a perspective that includes the role and the social function of the university. In the same way, it is relevant to include in the research works, critical perspectives that analyze the level and perspective of the response that universities have to the political responsibility that higher education currently has.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".