MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399663412 · doi:10.1117/12.3018466

The design and performance of the wheel systems in the common foreoptics of the ELT METIS

2024· article· en· W4399663412 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shiang‐Yu Wang, Chueh-Yi Chou, Masahiko Kimura, Hsin-Yo Chen, Pinjie Huang, Niels Tromp, Daan Zaalberg, Dennis Dolkens, Mirka Maresca, I. Lloro, Jeff Lynn, Jean-Christophe Barrière, Olivier Corpace, Olivier Absil, Gilles Orban de Xivry, Gert Raskin, Muhammad Salman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAcademia Sinica
KeywordsMetisComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mid-infrared ELT Imager and Spectrograph (METIS) is one of the first light instruments for the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) and will cover the thermal- and mid-infrared (3–13 μm). With the single conjugate adaptive optics (SCAO) system, it will enable high contrast imaging and integral field unit (IFU) spectroscopy (R ~ 100 000) at the diffraction limit of the ELT. Inside the METIS cryostat, it has a modular design and is composed of the common fore optics (CFO), the imager (IMG), the SCAO, and the L and M band integral field spectrograph (LMS). The components are cooled down to around 60K, or lower for the detectors, during the operation to reduce the background. In the CFO of METIS, four wheels are inserted in the optical path including the atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) wheel, the pupil plane one (PP1) wheel, the focal plane two (FP2) wheel and the LMS pickoff wheel. The PP1 wheel and the ADC wheel are located near the first pupil plane while the other two wheels are at the second focal plane. These wheels accommodate the optics, slits, masks and filters for various operation modes of METIS. In each wheel, common cartridges are designed to hold the optical elements to facilitate an easy exchange between them. High positioning repeatability is required for some of the optics. We will report the design and the initial integration and tests of the wheels in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstronomical Observations and InstrumentationFrench-language works237,207