MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399663412 · doi:10.1117/12.3018466

The design and performance of the wheel systems in the common foreoptics of the ELT METIS

2024· article· en· W4399663412 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shiang‐Yu Wang, Chueh-Yi Chou, Masahiko Kimura, Hsin-Yo Chen, Pinjie Huang, Niels Tromp, Daan Zaalberg, Dennis Dolkens, Mirka Maresca, I. Lloro, Jeff Lynn, Jean-Christophe Barrière, Olivier Corpace, Olivier Absil, Gilles Orban de Xivry, Gert Raskin, Muhammad Salman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAcademia Sinica
KeywordsMetisComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Mid-infrared ELT Imager and Spectrograph (METIS) is one of the first light instruments for the Extremely Large Telescope (ELT) and will cover the thermal- and mid-infrared (3–13 μm). With the single conjugate adaptive optics (SCAO) system, it will enable high contrast imaging and integral field unit (IFU) spectroscopy (R ~ 100 000) at the diffraction limit of the ELT. Inside the METIS cryostat, it has a modular design and is composed of the common fore optics (CFO), the imager (IMG), the SCAO, and the L and M band integral field spectrograph (LMS). The components are cooled down to around 60K, or lower for the detectors, during the operation to reduce the background. In the CFO of METIS, four wheels are inserted in the optical path including the atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) wheel, the pupil plane one (PP1) wheel, the focal plane two (FP2) wheel and the LMS pickoff wheel. The PP1 wheel and the ADC wheel are located near the first pupil plane while the other two wheels are at the second focal plane. These wheels accommodate the optics, slits, masks and filters for various operation modes of METIS. In each wheel, common cartridges are designed to hold the optical elements to facilitate an easy exchange between them. High positioning repeatability is required for some of the optics. We will report the design and the initial integration and tests of the wheels in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.263
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAstronomical Observations and InstrumentationFrench-language works237,207