MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399666696 · doi:10.26758/14.1.22

COVID-19, ANOSMIA AND ALZHEIMER’S DISEASE. A CASE REPORT OF A 81-YEAR-OLD PATIENT

2024· article· en· W4399666696 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Cătălina BUZDUGAN

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropological Researches and Studies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnosmiaCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)DiseaseMedicineSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakVirologyPathologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)Outbreak

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives. Among people over the age of 65, the prevalence of olfactory disorders can reach nearly 14%. The buildup of beta-amyloid plaques and tau neurofibrillary tangles in neurons in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex causes olfactory dysfunction, a decline in memory and learning processes, and, eventually, Alzheimer’s disease. According to current research, people aged 57 to 85 who have hyposmia are twice as likely to develop dementia within five years as people of the same age who do not have hyposmia. Anosmia is one of the most common COVID-19 symptoms. Methodology. An 81-year-old female patient is referred to the psychiatry clinic by her family physician after presenting with a two-year history of panic attacks, anxiety, and anosmia following the SARS-CoV-2 infection. At the first visit, the patient was examined neurologically, psychiatrically, and neurocognitively with the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 and Cognitive Reserve Questionnaire. The patient was recommended for laboratory tests, magnetic resonance imaging scan, and a complex neuropsychological evaluation. Results. The score on the Mini-Mental State Examination-2 (standard version) was 28/30, with fluent language, high cognitive reserve (score of 168), normal muscle tone and strength, and no evidence of cerebellar dysfunction or balance impairment with a normal gait. The extensive neuropsychological evaluation scores were: Mini-Mental State Examination-2 (extended version) 42/90; three words from 25 retained from short story recall; Montreal Cognitive Assessment 20/30; poor verbal fluency (patient was able to produce only six animal names and one word that starts with the letter F in one minute); and impaired visuospatial and executive abilities. Brain imaging results reveal moderate cortical atrophy, cerebral microangiopathy modifications with leukoaraiosis, and cerebral lacunarism. Conclusions. Olfactory impairment is a possible sign of prodromal dementia. Infection with the SARS-Cov-2 virus has worsened cognitive decline in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Keywords: anosmia, Alzheimer’s disease, COVID-19, cognitive decline, cognitive reserve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.601
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.474
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropological Researches and StudiesSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207