MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399675142 · doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad34cf

CLASSY. IX. The Chemical Evolution of the Ne, S, Cl, and Ar Elements

2024· article· en· W4399675142 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Karla Z. Arellano-Córdova, Danielle A. Berg, Matilde Mingozzi, Bethan L. James, Noah S. J. Rogers, Evan D. Skillman, Fergus Cullen, Ryan K. Alexander, R. Amorín, John Chisholm, Matthew Hayes, Timothy M. Heckman, Svea Hernández, Nimisha Kumari, Claus Leitherer, Crystal L. Martin, Michael V. Maseda, Themiya Nanayakkara, Kaelee S. Parker, Swara Ravindranath, Allison L. Strom, Fiorenzo Vincenzo, Aida Wofford

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astrophysical Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBrookhaven National LaboratoryFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaOffice of ScienceAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloLeibniz-Institut für Astrophysik PotsdamSpace Telescope Science InstituteEuropean Southern ObservatoryIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaYork UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaNational Science FoundationUK Research and InnovationArizona Board of RegentsCarnegie Mellon UniversityLeibniz-GemeinschaftUniversity of Notre DameUniversity of ArizonaCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityPrinceton UniversityAlfred P. Sloan FoundationUniversity of WashingtonEuropean Space AgencyJohns Hopkins UniversityHarvard UniversityOhio State UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityUniversity of PortsmouthYale UniversityVanderbilt UniversityNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsMetallicityGalaxyNeonStar formationGalaxy formation and evolutionAbundance (ecology)AstrophysicsCOSMIC cancer databasePhysicsRedshiftChemistryAtomic physicsEcologyArgonBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astrophysical Journal→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→