MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399677296 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae175.320

Early insulin resistance in low-risk subjects with normal glycemia is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis

2024· article· en· W4399677296 on OpenAlexaff
Josep Iglésies, Ana García‐Álvarez, Belén Oliva, Guiomar Mendieta, Inés García‐Lunar, José J. Fuster, Ana Devesa, Cristina Pérez-Herreras, Antonio Fernández‐Ortíz, Ramón Brugada, Borja Ibáñez, Rodrigo Fernández‐Jiménez, Valentı́n Fuster

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Canadian institutionsMontreal Heart Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInsulin resistanceSubclinical infectionInternal medicineGlycated hemoglobinOdds ratioAsymptomaticCardiologyCoronary artery diseaseCohortCoronary atherosclerosisHomeostatic model assessmentIntima-media thicknessDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesInsulinEndocrinologyCarotid arteries

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Higher glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are directly associated with subclinical atherosclerosis burden. However, the association between earlier insulin resistance markers and the development of subclinical atherosclerosis is poorly understood. Purpose To assess the association between the Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance Index (HOMA-IR) and subclinical atherosclerosis, on top of cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with normal HbA1c. Methods A cohort of 3,741 middle-aged individuals from the PESA study, with basal HbA1c <6.0% and without known CV disease, underwent extensive imaging (multi-territorial vascular ultrasound and coronary artery calcium score, CACS) to assess for the presence, burden, and extent of subclinical atherosclerosis. Results Individuals with higher HOMA-IR values had a higher prevalence of both traditional and non-traditional CV risk factors. Higher HOMA-IR values showed a positive association with the multi-territorial extent of subclinical atherosclerosis and CACS (p<0.001), Figure 1, and an increased global plaque volume by 3DVUS (p<0.001), Figure 2. The association was observed in both individuals with HbA1c levels below and above the median value of 5.4% (p < 0.001). This trend held for three individual territories (carotid, femoral, and coronary artery). Overall, after adjusting for key CV risk factors and HbA1c levels, HOMA-IR values ≥3 were associated with both the multi-territorial extent of subclinical atherosclerosis and CACS>0: odds ratio of 1.41 (95CI: 1.01 to 1.95, p=0.041), and 1.74 (95CI: 1.20 to 2.54, p=0.004) respectively, as compared to HOMA-IR <2 (reference). In a stratified analysis, this association remained significant in low-to-moderate SCORE2 risk individuals (75.6% of the cohort) but not in high-risk adults. Conclusions The use of HOMA-IR identified low-risk individuals with a higher burden of subclinical atherosclerosis on top of traditional CV risk factors and HbA1c. HOMA-IR is a simple measure in clinical practice that could facilitate earlier implementation of CV primary prevention strategies. HOMA-IR and subclinical atherosclerosis. HOMA-IR and 3D vascular ultrasound.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.277
Threshold uncertainty score0.814

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsFrench-language works237,207