MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399677987 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwae175.177

Exercise cardiac magnetic resonance imaging across the lifespan

2024· article· en· W4399677987 on OpenAlexaff
Brandon Hathorn, Sauyeh K. Zamani, Vlad G. Zaha, Tony G. Babb, Tarique Hussain, Mark J. Haykowsky, Benjamin D. Levine, Ayesha Zia, Justin L. Grodin, Michael D. Nelson

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingStroke volumeCardiologyVentricleCardiac magnetic resonance imagingInternal medicineNuclear medicineEjection fractionRadiologyHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Exercise cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) offers several advantages over contemporary stress imaging approaches, including improved spatial resolution, free of ionizing radiation. With exercise cMRI becoming increasingly popular, more work is needed to better understand the hemodynamic response across the lifespan. Purpose To compare the cMRI response to exercise across the lifespan. Methods To accomplish this purpose, we leveraged data from several ongoing imaging studies in which healthy control participants completed exercise cMRI across at least two discrete workloads, ranging in intensity from mild to moderate. Imaging was performed using either a 1.5T or 3T Phillips MRI scanner. Exercise was performed using an MR compatible ergometer (Cardio Step, Ergospect GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria). Volumetric data were measured from a stack of short axis images spanning the length of the left ventricle from base to apex. Results Exercise cardiac magnetic resonance images were available from 48 participants, ranging in age from 10 to 81 years. On average, end-diastolic volume remained unchanged with exercise (73±14 vs. 75±15 vs. 74±14 mL, rest vs. mild vs moderate, p = 0.107), while end-systolic volume was reduced (27±7 vs. 25±7 vs. 23±6 mL, p = <.001), resulting in a modest increase in stroke volume (46±9 vs. 50±10 vs. 51±10 mL, p = <.001). To evaluate the influence of age, we compared the youngest participants (n = 13, 10-30 yrs) against the oldest participants (n = 18, 65-81yrs). As illustrated in Figure 1, while baseline volumes differed significantly with age, the relative response to exercise was similar between groups. Likewise, to evaluate the influence of sex, we compared male (n = 21) versus female (n = 27) participants. As illustrated in panels D-F, ventricular volumes were greater in men compared with women, but the exercise relative responses were similar. Conclusions Taken together, these data add to a growing body of literature highlighting the feasibility of exercise cardiac magnetic resonance imaging across the lifespan, and begin to define the normative response for future clinical comparison.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207