MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399680682 · doi:10.1353/bh.2024.a929573

Ni Kinidi/Making Book: Textual Mobility in 1830s Cape Palmas, West Africa

2024· article· en· W4399680682 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marie Stango

Bibliographic record

VenueBook history · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapeHistoryAncient historyGenealogyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ni Kinidi/Making Book:Textual Mobility in 1830s Cape Palmas, West Africa Marie Stango (bio) In December 1835, John Leighton Wilson carried a stack of writing paper some 800 kilometers up the coast of West Africa, from his Cape Palmas mission station called "Fair Hope" to Cape Mesurado, where the largest settlement in Liberia, called Monrovia, was located. Wilson, a white missionary from South Carolina sent to West Africa on behalf of the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions (ABCFM), arrived at the Monrovia offices of the Liberia Herald, the first newspaper established in the American settlements comprised of freeborn and formerly enslaved Black Americans that came to be known as "Liberia." There, Wilson commissioned the Herald's printer, James C. Minor, to produce a primer in the Grebo language, a West African language spoken in the vicinity of Cape Palmas. Encouraged by news that a few Black American children in Liberia had been able to learn multiple West African languages, Wilson had been at work creating a written form of Grebo, using Roman letters, since his early days in Cape Palmas.1 Wilson, like many Anglo-American Protestant missionaries of his generation, was intrigued by the languages spoken by the individuals around him. After initially hoping to teach Grebo-speakers English, Wilson eventually concluded that it would work better to teach his pupils to read religious texts in their own language—a language Wilson had to codify first.2 Like many Protestant missionaries of the early nineteenth century, the ABCFM missionaries in Cape Palmas hoped to offer the Word to would-be converts in the vernacular.3 Embedded in the ABCFM's mission was the fervent wish that their work could bring the trappings of Western-style civilization—including education, literacy, and printed texts—to peoples they viewed as less civilized. Both the Fair Hope missionaries and the Black American settlers in Cape Palmas viewed the Grebos as unsophisticated and illiterate people. In his attempts to create a written Grebo language and [End Page 51] print books in it, Wilson assumed that they had no knowledge of written languages nor of print. While indeed the ABCFM did eventually finance the transportation of the first printing press to Cape Palmas, the Grebos that Wilson met in Cape Palmas were not newcomers to the concepts of written texts. This article explores how the meanings of print were complicated in Cape Palmas. While Wilson and the Fair Hope missionaries believed that they were bringing a new technology to the Grebo, Wilson's own observations reveal a more tangled story. As coastal people with centuries of trading relations with Europeans before the arrival of the Americans in Cape Palmas, Grebos brought prior understandings of both manuscript and print writing to bear on their interactions with the missionaries. Wilson disparagingly observed that Grebos only had one word to describe both manuscript and print: ni kinidi. He determined that the term meant "to make a book."4 What Wilson missed, or refused to see, was that the Grebos he spoke with understood "books" in two ways. While "book" was used to refer to the physical object of the printed text, "book" also referred to a written agreement signed between Grebos and Europeans or Americans. As Meredith McGill has explained, attention to format might help us understand the "signifying capacities of different aspects of books."5 Similarly, in her work on the mobility of Paul Bunyan's The Pilgrim's Progress, Isabel Hofmeyr explains that examining the book "as a material object" offers one way to examine mission-produced translations.6 In a complex society such as the one that emerged in Cape Palmas in the 1830s, format took on expansive meanings for the audience envisioned in the production of the Grebo texts. I maintain that the second Grebo definition of "book"—as a written agreement—also inflected the printed matter that came off the Fair Hope press. In this sense, the book-as-object, regardless of actual content, stood in for a tacit understanding that, by giving someone a book, the missionaries were establishing a relationship with the recipient. Instead of revealing unfamiliarity with printing, as Wilson argued, the dual meaning of ni kinidi...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0390.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBook historySame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207