Single-Shot Visual Relationship Detection for the Accurate Identification of Contact-Driven Hazards in Sustainable Digitized Construction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deploying construction robots alongside workers presents the risk of unwanted forcible contact—a critical safety concern. To address a semantic digital twin where such contact-driven hazards can be monitored accurately, the authors present a single-shot deep neural network (DNN) model that can perform proximity and relationship detections simultaneously. Given that workers and construction robots must sometimes collaborate in close proximity, their relationship must be considered, along with proximity, before concluding an event is a hazard. To address this issue, we leveraged a unique two-in-one DNN architecture called Pixel2Graph (i.e., object + relationship detections). The potential of this DNN architecture for relationship detection was confirmed by follow-up testing using real-site images, achieving 90.63% recall@5 when object bounding boxes and classes were given. When integrated with existing proximity monitoring methods, single-shot visual relationship detection will enable the accurate identification of contact-driven hazards in a digital twin platform, an essential step in realizing sustainable and safe collaboration between workers and robots.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".