MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399689914 · doi:10.2337/db24-78-or

78-OR: Breath Acetone Correlates with Capillary Beta Hydroxybutyrate in Type 1 Diabetes

2024· article· en· W4399689914 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kai Jones, MAX C. PETERSEN, Alexander M. Markov, Petra Krutilova, ALEXIS M. MCKEE, Kathryn L. Bohnert, Samantha E. Adamson, Maamoun Salam, Janet B. McGill

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiet and metabolism studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBraceDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetesDapagliflozinInsulinInternal medicineEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Prior work has shown a linear relationship between breath acetone (BrACE) and capillary blood beta hydroxybutyrate (BOHB) in persons without diabetes. This innovative study investigates the correlation between capillary BOHB and BrACE in T1D during usual care and while taking an SGLT2 inhibitor in both insulin-sufficient and -deficient states. The primary outcome of the study is the correlation of capillary BOHB and BrACE. Methods: Participants provided written consent and were randomized to 2 weeks of usual care and 1 day of insulin withdrawal followed by 2 weeks of usual care plus dapagliflozin, 10 mg daily and 1 day of insulin withdrawal or the opposite sequence. Paired BOHB (Precision Xtra®, Abbott) and BrACE (Biosense®, Readout) were obtained 3X daily for 2 weeks, then hourly during supervised insulin withdrawal. Sick day rules were reviewed and insulin doses were minimally adjusted when taking dapagliflozin. The data was tested for normality and the Spearman’s test was utilized due to non-normally distributed data. Results: Participant age was 48 ±18 years (mean ± SD), baseline A1c 7.0 ± 0.9%, and CGM time in range [70-180mg/dL] 61 ± 18%. During outpatient care, BrACE and BOHB were weakly correlated both without dapagliflozin (n=689 paired readings; Spearman’s ρ = 0.44; 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.50) and with dapagliflozin (n=718 paired readings; ρ = 0.32; 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.39). However, BrACE and BOHB were strongly correlated during supervised insulin withdrawal (n=246 paired values, ρ = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.77 to 0.85). In ROC analysis, BrACE of ≥ 5 demonstrated optimal sensitivity (93%) and specificity (87%) for detecting a capillary BOHB > 1.5 mmol/L. No serious adverse events occurred. Conclusion: In adults with T1D, BrACE monitoring provides a noninvasive estimate of ambient ketone levels when compared to blood BOHB but is more useful under supervised conditions with greater range of ketone production and less potential for interference with volatile organic compounds than in typical outpatient settings. Disclosure K. Jones: None. M.C. Petersen: None. A.M. Markov: None. P. Krutilova: None. A.M. McKee: Advisory Panel; Medtronic, Novo Nordisk. Employee; Novo Nordisk. K.L. Bohnert: None. S.E. Adamson: None. M. Salam: None. J.B. McGill: Advisory Panel; Bayer Inc., Boehringer-Ingelheim, ClearNote Health, Lilly Diabetes, MannKind Corporation, Novo Nordisk. Research Support; Novo Nordisk. Funding JDRF DRCICTS

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiet and metabolism studiesFrench-language works237,207