MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399693737 · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001768

Natural effects with a recanting witness: non-identifiability or meaningless estimand?

2024· letter· en· W4399693737 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ian Shrier

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWitnessEpidemiologyJudaismUniversity hospitalClinical epidemiologyLibrary scienceHistoryMedicineFamily medicinePolitical scienceLawPathologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ian Shrier: Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, and Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal Canada. (https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-3498) Source of Funding: None Conflicts of Interest: None Data availability: Not applicable Corresponding Author: Ian Shrier MD, PhD Centre for Clinical Epidemiology Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University 3755 Cote Sainte Catherine Road Montreal, QC H3T 1E2, Canada Tel: (514) 340-7563; Email: [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.912
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.177
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesFrench-language works237,207