Structural determination of a carbocation-derived rearrangement product observed during Thiele cage opening: insight into the mechanism of an alkyl-extended pinacol reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A substituted bishomocubane structure colloquially known as a Thiele cage was previously observed to undergo an alkyl-extended pinacol-type rearrangement, wherein 1,2-aryl migration and ketone formation occurred together with (or at least in close succession to) opening of a strained cyclobutane bond. While there was some indication that the rearrangement reaction might proceed via a stepwise process involving a sequence of carbocation intermediates, previous studies did not uncover any direct evidence for the formation of carbocations, and did not fully explain the regio- and stereospecificity of the reaction. Here we describe the isolation and detailed characterization of a second rearrangement product formed under the pinacol reaction conditions, the existence of which implicates the formation of discrete carbocation intermediates along the reaction pathway. Observation of this new product also finally explains the fate of any Thiele cage material that is converted to a carbocation, but which is not geometrically predisposed to react through a facile 1,2-aryl migration. As such, our findings resolve previous questions surrounding the origin of regio- and stereospecificity in the alkyl-extended pinacol rearrangement.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".