MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399697589 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2024-0025

Structural determination of a carbocation-derived rearrangement product observed during Thiele cage opening: insight into the mechanism of an alkyl-extended pinacol reaction

2024· article· en· W4399697589 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Austin L. Burman, Jonathan K. Sader, Jeremy E. Wulff

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSynthetic Organic Chemistry Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCarbocationChemistryStereospecificityAlkylPinacolSN1 reactionReaction mechanismStereochemistryReaction intermediateArylPhotochemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisNucleophile

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A substituted bishomocubane structure colloquially known as a Thiele cage was previously observed to undergo an alkyl-extended pinacol-type rearrangement, wherein 1,2-aryl migration and ketone formation occurred together with (or at least in close succession to) opening of a strained cyclobutane bond. While there was some indication that the rearrangement reaction might proceed via a stepwise process involving a sequence of carbocation intermediates, previous studies did not uncover any direct evidence for the formation of carbocations, and did not fully explain the regio- and stereospecificity of the reaction. Here we describe the isolation and detailed characterization of a second rearrangement product formed under the pinacol reaction conditions, the existence of which implicates the formation of discrete carbocation intermediates along the reaction pathway. Observation of this new product also finally explains the fate of any Thiele cage material that is converted to a carbocation, but which is not geometrically predisposed to react through a facile 1,2-aryl migration. As such, our findings resolve previous questions surrounding the origin of regio- and stereospecificity in the alkyl-extended pinacol rearrangement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.778

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicSynthetic Organic Chemistry MethodsFrench-language works237,207