MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399712285 · doi:10.3208/jgssp.v10.os-33-06

Site effects observed in Antakya after the M<sub>W</sub> 7.7 Pazarcik and M<sub>W</sub> 7.6 Elbistan Earthquakes on the 6<sup>th </sup>February 2023 (Türkiye)

2024· article· en· W4399712285 on OpenAlexaff
Mourad Karray, Alper Sezer, Anna Chiaradonna, Eyyüb Karakan, Cem Kıncal, Giuseppe Lanzo, Paola Alfonsa Vieira Lo Monaco

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringGeologySeismologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On February 6, 2023 Eastern Türkiye was shaken by two consecutive catastrophic earthquakes of moment magnitudes 7.7. and 7.6, induced by a left-lateral strike-slip fault in Eastern Anatolian Fault Zone. The first earthquake with a moment magnitude 7.6 was felt at 4:17 local time in the morning, while, approximately nine hours later, the second earthquake with a moment magnitude 7.7 increased the massive damage that occurred in eleven provinces of Turkiye including Hatay, Kahramanmaras, Adiyaman, Malatya, Osmaniye, Gaziantep, Kilis, Sanliurfa, Diyarbakir, Adana and Elazig. In this paper, a specific focus is devoted to show the site effects observed in Antakya after the strong shakings as revealed by an extensive analysis of the collected ground motion records and geological and geotechnical data. It is shown that basin effects are associated with a higher level of damage compared to areas with the same level of ground shaking but without detrimental conditions of the local soils. The lessons learned from this seismic event highlight the key role played by the seismic response analysis and related tools of microzonation studies for the mitigation of the seismic risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.783
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJapanese Geotechnical Society Special PublicationSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207