Gender Ideology of the Puritans in the Thomas Gataker’s Sermon to newlyweds: the Case of Lady Brilliana Harley
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье рассматривается как пуританские проповеди новобрачным сформировали особый гендерный дискурс, позволявший женщинам не только принимать активное участие в жизни благочестивой общины верующих, но и брать на себя подчас мужские обязанности, связанные с управлением поместьем и его обороной. Ярким примером этого служит случай леди Бриллианы Харли, бракосочетанию которой была посвящена одна из трех известных брачных проповедей Томаса Гатейкера «Совершенная жена» (1623). Будучи женой парламентария сэра Роберта Харли, Бриллиана управляла делами своего родового поместья, в то время как ее муж заседал в парламенте до и во время Гражданской войны. Она организовала оборону замка во время его осады роялистами летом 1643 г. Богатое эпистолярное наследие Бриллианы Харли позволяет проанализировать насколько пуританская гендерная идеология, заложенная в проповеди Гатейкера, повлияла на ее выбор жизненных стратегий. This article examines how Puritan sermons to newlyweds formed a special gender discoursethat allowed women not only to take an active part in the life of a godly community, but alsoto take male responsibilities related to the management and defense of the estate. A striking example of this isthe case of Lady Brilliana Harley, whose marriage was the subject of one of Thomas Gutaker's three famous marriage sermons,“A Wife in Deed” (1623). As thewife of Parliamentarian Sir Robert Harley, Brilliana managed the affairs of her ancestral estate, Brampton Brian Castle, while her husband sat in Parliament before and during the Civil War. She organized the defenseof the castle during its siege bythe Royalists in the summer of 1643. Brilliana Harley's rich epistolary heritage allows us to analyze how the puritan gender ideology embedded in Gataker's sermon influenced her choice of life strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.042 | 0.026 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".