Serum metabolomics reveals the effectiveness of human placental mesenchymal stem cell therapy for Crohn's disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy offers a promising cure for Crohn's disease (CD), however, its therapeutic effects vary significantly due to individual differences. Therefore, identifying easily detectable biomarkers is essential to assess the efficacy of MSC therapy. In this study, SAMP1/Yit mice were used as a model of CD, which develop spontaneous chronic ileitis, closely resembling the characteristics present in CD patients. Serum metabolic alterations during treatment were analyzed, through the application of differential 12C-/13C-dansylation labeling liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Based on the significant differences and time-varying trends of serum amine/phenol-containing metabolites abundance between the control group, the model group, and the treatment group, four serum biomarkers were ultimately screened for evaluating the efficacy of MSC treatment for CD, namely 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate, 4-hydroxyphenylacetaldehyde, caffeate, and N-acetyltryptamine, whose abundances both increased in the serum of CD model mice and decreased after MSC treatment. These metabolic alterations were associated with tyrosine metabolism, which was validated by the dysregulation of related enzymes. The discovery of biomarkers may help to improve the targeting and effectiveness of treatment and provide innovative prospects for the clinical application of MSC for CD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".