MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399735863 · doi:10.1306/03052418150

Impact of CO2 influx on sandstone reservoir quality: A case study of the Quantou Formation, southern Songliao Basin, China

2024· article· en· W4399735863 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Cao, Chengyan Lin, Chunmei Dong, Lihua Ren, Keyu Liu, Karem Azmy, Hairuo Qing, Jason Cosford

Bibliographic record

VenueAAPG Bulletin · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ReginaMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinChinaGeochemistrySouthern chinaMining engineeringGeomorphologyArchaeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The CO2-gas reservoirs have been recorded in many petroliferous basins worldwide. However, the impact of deep inorganic CO2 influx on reservoir quality has received little attention. Here, a new set of mineralogical and geochemical data collected from the Lower Cretaceous Quantou Formation sandstones in the southern Songliao Basin are presented to address this issue. The sandstones were broadly subdivided into two zones based on their mineralogical compositions: (1) a normal zone with higher porosity (average 13.7%) and permeability (average 3.27 md) that is located >10 km from the Gudian fault (composed of ferrocalcite, ankerite, quartz, mixed-layer illite/smectite (I/S), kaolinite, illite, and chlorite); and (2) a dawsonite-bearing zone with relatively poor reservoir quality (average 10.1% and 0.4 md) adjacent to the Gudian fault (consisting of dawsonite, ankerite, quartz, I/S, and illite). The carbon sources for dawsonite and ankerite in the dawsonite-bearing zone (δ13C = −5.7‰ to −0.8‰ and δ18O = −20.6‰ to −17.1‰, and Sr = 0.710216–0.712472) are mostly a mix of mantle magmatic CO2 and crustal CO2, with a small amount of organic CO2, which is the opposite of that for the ferrocalcite and ankerite in the normal zone (δ13C = −10.5‰ to −2.3‰, δ18O = −19.3‰ to −14.9‰, and Sr = 0.712060–0.714030). Observations of the dawsonite-bearing zone demonstrate higher contents of carbonate and quartz cements, specific clay mineral types (mixed-layer I/S with Reichweite order of R = 3 and illite), and poor reservoir quality and oil productivity due to the influx of deep inorganic CO2 dating to circa 65–44 Ma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.119
Threshold uncertainty score0.658

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAAPG BulletinSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207