MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Performance characteristics of a tissue-agnostic genome-wide methylome enrichment MRD assay for head and neck malignancies.

2024· article· en· W4399737564 on OpenAlexaff
Geoffrey Liu, Martha Pienkowski, Shao Hui Huang, Laurie Ailles, Katrina Rey‐McIntyre, Jun Won Min, Yarong Wang, Justin Burgener, Joshua T. Jones, Ben Brown, Junjun Zhang, Owen Hall, Shu Yi Shen, Jeremy Provance, Eduardo V. Sosa, Jing Zhang, Abel Licon, Brian Allen, Anne‐Renee Hartman, Daniel D. De Carvalho

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHead and neckHead and neck cancerGenomeDNA methylationComputational biologyCancer researchCancerGeneticsGeneInternal medicineBiologySurgeryGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3009 Background: Plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) tests have emerged as a promising approach for cancer management. cfDNA methylome approaches are well-suited for molecular residual disease (MRD) detection. Here we present data using a tissue-agnostic, genome-wide methylome enrichment platform based on cell-free methylated DNA immunoprecipitation and high throughput sequencing (cfMEDIP-seq) in head and neck cancer (HNC) to predict relapse for purposes of guiding adjuvant therapy after completion of curative-intent treatment and to detect early relapse. Methods: The cohort is comprised of biobanked samples from individuals diagnosed with stage I-IVB human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative and HPV-positive HNC with longitudinal data collection and sampling. The full cohort includes 325 unique patients with 1,155 samples. Samples were split into distinct sets to train and test a classifier consisting of differentially methylated regions. Blood collection time points include at diagnosis, and approximately 3 (landmark), 12 and 24 months after curative intent treatment. 5-10 ng of cfDNA isolated from each plasma sample was used for cfMEDIP-seq. MRD signals were quantified from average normalized counts across informative methylated regions and binarized into a positive (above the threshold) and negative groups. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared for patients who tested positive to those who tested negative at 3 months post-curative treatment (i.e., landmark timepoint) and longitudinally. Results: A total of 196 post-treatment samples from 80 unique patients [stage I (35%), II (15%), III (24%), IV (26%)] were analyzed and correlated with recurrence, in this interim training result. At the landmark timepoint, patients who tested positive showed significantly worse RFS than those who tested negative (Hazard ratio (HR) 9.69; 95% CI, 4.39-21.4, P<0.001). Incorporating serial longitudinal samples, recurrence-free survival was worse in patients who tested positive compared to those that tested negative (HR 14.52; 95% CI, 5.78-36.46, P<0.001). Conclusions: Interim analysis demonstrates that MRD detection with a tissue-agnostic, genome-wide methylome enrichment platform in HNC patients after curative intent treatment correlates strongly with RFS with hazard ratios consistent with tumor-informed assays previously described. Updated analyses from the cohort will be presented at the meeting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.348 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→