MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399760496 · doi:10.1093/neuonc/noae064.680

OTHR-09. HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS’ PERSPECTIVES ON MALAYSIA-SINGAPORE VIRTUAL PEDIATRIC NEURO-ONCOLOGY TUMOR BOARD MEETING

2024· article· en· W4399760496 on OpenAlexaff
Revathi Rajagopal, Jen Chun Foo, Jillian Chui Lin Teo, Rafikah Sawal, Vida Jawin, Ana Patricia Alcasabas, Thi Kim Nguyen Ho, C‐Khai Loh, Shweta Bansal, Kok Hoi Teh, Sharon Y. Y. Low, Dharmendra Ganesan, Kenneth Tou En Chang, Shui Yen Soh, Mohamed S Abdelbaki, Éric Bouffet, Nicholas G. Gottardo, Enrica E. K. Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuro-Oncology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPediatric oncologyHealth careMedicineInternal medicinePolitical scienceCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract BACKGROUND Virtual pediatric neuro-oncology tumor board meetings have been reported to be highly beneficial in improving the delivery of high-quality care for childhood central nervous system (CNS) tumors. However, such meetings are lacking in the Asia Pacific region. Hence, we initiated the first pediatric neuro-oncology online platform in the Asia Pacific region in January 2019, and we aimed to describe the participants’ perception of the virtual tumor board meetings. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed all cases from January 2019 to December 2023 and conducted a web-based survey to all participants in December 2023. Centers that presented more than five cases were invited to assess the impact of virtual meetings. RESULTS Fifty-four meetings have been conducted over five years. A total of 160 cases were presented by 20 institutions from six Asian countries, which include Malaysia, Singapore, Philippines, Vietnam, India, and Taiwan. Thirty participants responded to the survey. Majority of them attended the meetings to enhance their knowledge in pediatric neuro-oncology (96.7%), to learn evidence-based management (83.3%), and to build connections with regional colleagues and international experts (53.3%). Almost all concluded that tumor board meetings improved treatment decisions, addressed challenges of complex CNS tumor cases, and promoted continuity of care with appropriate post-surgical chemotherapy administration and surveillance investigations after completion of treatment. The main reason for case discussion was diagnostic difficulties followed by multimodal treatment advice (85.7%). More than 25% of management changes were observed in pathological diagnosis and treatment approaches. All the hospitals reported that the online case discussions improved pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity and increased local team competence. CONCLUSION Virtual pediatric neuro-oncology tumor board meetings facilitated improvement in pathological diagnosis and multimodal treatment approach. The establishment of virtual CNS tumor board meetings is an effective way to seek international expert advice and promote pediatric neuro-oncology education in our region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuro-OncologySame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207