MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4399765299 · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000209571

Association of Gestational Age at Birth and Changes on MRI With Prevalence and Spectrum of Comorbidities in Children With Cerebral Palsy

2024· article· en· W4399765299 on OpenAlexaffabout
Heather Pekeles, Nafisa Husein, Adam Kirton, Maryam Oskoui, Darcy Fehlings, Mary Dunbar, Michael Shevell

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCerebral palsyMedicinePediatricsGestational ageAssociation (psychology)GestationPregnancyObstetricsPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: For individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and caregivers, comorbidities may be a greater challenge than neuromotor impairment. Clinicians may make assumptions regarding risk of comorbidities based simply on term vs preterm birth, but this has not been well examined. To better understand factors affecting comorbidity pattern, we investigated the relationship between gestational age (GA) and imaging pattern on the presence of specific comorbidities. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of data extracted from the Canadian Cerebral Palsy Registry of children with CP. Multivariable analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between brain injury, GA, and comorbidities. Comorbidities included in the analysis were communication, cognitive, visual, and auditory impairment, seizures in the past year, and gavage feeding. Each comorbidity was assessed as a separate nonexclusive outcome, with GA, MRI pattern, birth weight, postneonatal insult, 5-minute Apgar score, and male sex considered as potential modifiers. RESULTS: The only comorbidity affected by GA on multivariable analysis was seizures within the past year that were more prevalent in term children (odds ratio [OR] 1.1 95% CI 1.0-1.2) and was also affected by Apgar score (OR 0.9 95% CI 0.85-0.94), but not MRI pattern. MRI pattern appeared important for communication impairment (deep gray OR 4.2 95% CI 1.8-10.0; total brain injury OR 8.5, 95% CI 3.2-22.6; malformation OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.7) and cognitive impairment (deep gray OR 5.6, 95% CI 2.4-13.2; total brain injury OR 10.1, 95% CI 4.0-25.3; malformation OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.6-6.8; watershed OR 3.6, 95% CI 1.4-8.9). Focal injury compared with normal MRI was associated with reduced odds of visual impairment (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.12-0.48), auditory impairment (OR 0.2195% CI 0.10-0.46) and communication impairment (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.82), and overall number of comorbidities (coefficient -0.73, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.31). The number of comorbidities was increased by total brain injury pattern (coefficient 0.65, 95% CI 0.15-1.13) and reduced by focal brain injury (coefficient -0.73, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.31) and increasing 5-minute Apgar score (coefficient -0.11, 95% CI -0.16 to -0.07). DISCUSSION: In those with brain injuries sufficient to cause CP, development of additional comorbidities is less affected by GA at birth and more related to the underlying cause of CP as reflected by MRI patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.168
Threshold uncertainty score0.333

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurology→Same topicCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders→French-language works237,207→