MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399766005 · doi:10.1177/13694332241254601

Full scale testing of ultra-high performance concrete closure joint for prefabricated full-depth precast concrete bridge deck panel system

2024· article· en· W4399766005 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Structural Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPrecast concreteStructural engineeringJoint (building)Full scaleClosure (psychology)Bridge (graph theory)DeckBridge deckEngineeringMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of the transverse joint between prefabricated full-depth precast concrete deck panels is to prevent the relative vertical movement between the panels and to transfer the loads between adjacent panels without cracking. The most common failure mode for these types of joints during their service life are the interface cracks. Such cracks serve as a conduit for ingress of water into the superstructure, leading to further deterioration requiring frequent maintenance. UHPC is known for its high tensile and bond strengths and is often considered as a joint fill material that has the potential to make this connection more durable. This research has been initiated to investigate if closure joints cast using UHPC material can compete with the performance of monolithic deck systems. The experimental program consisted of two full-scale concrete bridge decks that were statically tested until failure. One bridge deck was a jointed panel deck (JPD) consisting of two half-size panels connected by UHPC closure joint, while the control deck was a full panel deck (FPD) cast as one monolithic specimen. Both decks were connected to the steel girders with UHPC shear pockets that contained four to six shear studs welded to the girder flange. The JPD had rectangular tapered shear pockets and the FPD had circular shaped pockets. The results indicated that the JPD and FPD reached the same ultimate loads, and both failed via concrete punching at the load point situated adjacent to the closure joint of JPD. The results demonstrated that using UHPC closure joint resulted in similar performance and behaviour under loading as the monolithic deck. The interfacial failure was not indicated even at ultimate loads. This confirms the ability of the UHPC closure joint to transfer the load to the adjacent panel. The results also indicated the use of circular or rectangular pockets led to similar behaviours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.452
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it