MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399771577 · doi:10.32920/26052916

The Effects of Social Anxiety, Taijin Kyofusho, Resilience, and Social Support on Acculturative Stress in Asian International Students

2024· preprint· en· W4399771577 on OpenAlexaffabout
Da Ye Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducation and Learning Interventions
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAcculturationPsychologyResilience (materials science)Social anxietyAnxietyPsychological resilienceSocial supportSocial psychologyClinical psychologyPolitical scienceImmigrationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The stress response to the stressors associated with acculturation is called acculturative stress, which is associated with negative outcomes such as symptoms of depression and anxiety. This thesis examined the extent to which acculturative stress is related to social anxiety, Taijin Kyofusho, resilience, social support, and types of social support in Asian international students studying in Canada. In this online cross-sectional study, a sample (n=75) of Asian international students, currently enrolled in postsecondary programs in Canada, completed self-report measures of acculturative stress, social anxiety, Taijin Kyofusho, resilience, social support, and sources of social support. The results indicated that social anxiety, Taijin Kyofusho, and resilience are related to acculturative stress, but that social anxiety is more strongly related to acculturative stress compared to Taijin Kyofusho. Social support did not predict acculturative stress, but living with family members was positively related to acculturative stress. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.551

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEducation and Learning InterventionsFrench-language works237,207