MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399775192 · doi:10.1186/s13045-024-01565-2

Non-invasive diagnosis of esophageal cancer by a simplified circulating cell-free DNA methylation assay targeting OTOP2 and KCNA3: a double-blinded, multicenter, prospective study

2024· letter· en· W4399775192 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Bian, Ye Gao, Lin Han, Chang Sun, Wei Wang, Siyu Sun, Xiuling Li, Zhijie Feng, Jianlin Ren, Hezhong Chen, Chaojing Lu, Jinfang Xu, Jun Zhou, Kangkang Wan, Lei Xin, Zhaoshen Li, Luo‐Wei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hematology & Oncology · 2024
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineGastroenterologyProspective cohort studyEsophageal cancerMultiplexCell-free fetal DNACancerReceiver operating characteristicStage (stratigraphy)OncologyBioinformaticsPrenatal diagnosisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Esophageal cancer (EC) is a highly lethal disease lacking early detection approaches. We previously identified that OTOP2 and KCNA3 were specifically hypermethylated in circulating cell-free DNA from patients with EC. We then developed a blood-based methylation assay targeting OTOP2 and KCNA3 (named "IEsohunter") for esophageal cancer noninvasive detection. This double-blinded, multicenter, prospective study aimed to comprehensively evaluate its clinical diagnostic performance. METHODS: Participants with EC, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN), other malignancies, benign gastrointestinal lesions, or no abnormalities were prospectively enrolled from 5 tertiary referral centers across China. Peripheral blood samples were collected, followed by plasma cell-free DNA methylation analysis using the IEsohunter test based on multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction adopting an algorithm-free interpretation strategy. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of IEsohunter test for EC. RESULTS: We prospectively enrolled 1116 participants, including 334 patients with EC, 71 with HGIN, and 711 controls. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the IEsohunter test for detecting EC and HGIN were 0.903 (95% CI 0.880-0.927) and 0.727 (95% CI 0.653-0.801), respectively. IEsohunter test showed sensitivities of 78.5% (95% CI 69.1-85.6), 87.3% (95% CI 79.4-92.4), 92.5% (95% CI 85.9-96.2), and 96.9% (95% CI 84.3-99.8) for stage I-IV EC, respectively, with an overall sensitivity of 87.4% (95% CI 83.4-90.6) and specificity of 93.3% (95% CI 91.2-94.9) for EC detection. The IEsohunter test status turned negative (100.0%, 47/47) after surgical resection of EC. CONCLUSIONS: The IEsohunter test showed high diagnostic accuracy for EC detection, indicating that it could potentially serve as a tool for noninvasive early detection and surveillance of EC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.336 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Hematology & OncologySame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207