MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399778949 · doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2024.101750

Proof of ssDNA degraded from dsDNA for ET recombination

2024· article· en· W4399778949 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanxia Zheng, Yi Zhang, Xuegang Li, Liangwei Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueBiochemistry and Biophysics Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Agriculture
FundersHenan Agricultural UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsNucleaseDNAChemistryFluorescenceRecombinationNucleotideMolecular biologyElectrophoresisGel electrophoresisDouble strandedBiochemistryBiophysicsBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The widely used ET recombination requires an ssDNA product degraded by Rac phage protein E588 from dsDNA for strand invasion. However, proof of the ssDNA product is still elusive. The study provided three levels of proof sequentially. The probable ssDNAs degraded by E588 from the fluorescent plus-, minus-, or double-stranded dsDNA pET28a-xylanase exhibited a half fluorescence intensity of the corresponding dsDNAs, equivalent to the E588 degradation nucleotides half that of the total nucleotides degraded from the corresponding dsDNA. The ssDNA product degraded by E588 from the fluorescent minus-stranded dsDNA was confirmed by gradient gel-electrophoresis and two nuclease degradation reactions. Degraded by E588 from the dsDNA pET28a-xylanase that had a phosphorothioated plus-stranded 5'-terminus, the plus-stranded ssDNA product was separated via gel electrophoresis and recovered via a DNAclean kit. The recovered ssDNA product was proven to have intact 5'- and 3'-ends by DNA sequencing analysis. This study provides a solid foundation for the mechanism of ssDNA invasion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.454

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiochemistry and Biophysics ReportsSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207