MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4399779656 · doi:10.1002/pts.2830

“Sandwich” Structure (PLA/Thymol Fibre Membranes/SAP/Paper Fibre) Antibacterial Pad for Preservation of Chilled Mutton

2024· article· en· W4399779656 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePackaging Technology and Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAntimicrobial agents and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThymolMembraneAntibacterial activityFood scienceChemistrySpinningMaterials scienceComposite materialBacteriaBiochemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The antibacterial pad was developed to solve the preservation problem of chilled mutton. The antibacterial pad was a “Sandwich” structure (PLA/thymol fibre membranes/SAP/paper fibre), which could absorb water and inhibit bacteria. The fibre membranes are prepared by electrostatic spinning technology. The successful incorporation of thymol into the fibre membranes was proved by FTIR, SEM and water contact angle analysis. The release experiment showed that the fibre membranes (PLA/thymol) had a slow‐release effect, especially in fatty food simulants. According to the antibacterial experiment, the antibacterial pad had a significant inhibition effect on Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus (the inhibition zone was 25 ~ 26 mm). In addition, the total viable count, total volatile alkaline nitrogen, pH value and drip loss showed that the antibacterial pads could effectively extend the shelf life of chilled mutton for 6 days. Therefore, the antibacterial pad has broad application prospects in meat preservation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it