MDB-75. MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, TREATMENT AND PROGNOSIS OF INFANT SONIC HEDGEHOG MEDULLOBLASTOMA: A GLOBAL MULTI-COHORT STUDY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Clinical studies in infant medulloblastoma (iMB; <5 years) have, to date, focussed on modestly-sized or national trials cohorts and have not directly compared therapeutic approaches or placed these in the context of dedicated biomarker studies, to inform future treatment strategies. METHODS We assembled a multi-national cohort of molecularly and clinically-annotated iMBs (<5 years at diagnosis; n=646), the largest to date. We investigated molecular pathology, treatments received, and relationships to outcome within this population. RESULTS The SHH group (iMBSHH; n=267, 40%) predominated, encompassing SHH-1 (37.7%, median age 2.0 years), SHH-2 (47.0%, 1.4 years) and SHH-3 (14.4%, 3.0 years) WHO subgroups. MBEN histology was significantly enriched in SHH-2, and SUFU mutation and MYCN amplification in SHH-1 and SHH-3, respectively. Notably, TP53 mutations were identified in all subgroups; in SHH-1 and SHH-2 (each n=3) tumours lacked features typically associated with TP53-mutated SHH-3 (LCA histology and MYCN amplification) and did not have a worse survival. Upfront radiation-sparing treatments were used in 132/267 children and comprised regimens founded on intraventricular methotrexate (IVT-MTX; 54.5%), high-dose (HDCTx; 22.0%) or standard-dose (23.5%) chemotherapy. Across all radio-naive iMBSHH, non-DN/MBEN histology (HR 2.76, CI 1.26-6.01, p=0.011) and SHH-1 (vs SHH-2, HR 2.51, CI 1.25-5.01, p=0.009) conferred worse PFS in univariable analysis; subgroup was the only independently prognostic risk-factor (multivariable analysis; SHH-1 HR 2.65, CI 1.27-5.51, p=0.009). 5-year OS for HDCTx recipients was very favourable in SHH-1 (100%) and SHH-2 (93.3%), and subgroup-dependent for IVT-MTX (SHH-1; 76.4%, SHH-2; 100%, p=0.009). In CSI-treated iMBSHH (n=49), non-DN/MBEN histology (HR 10.23, CI 2.22-47.04, p=0.003) and MYCN amplification (HR 7.35, CI 2.01-26.87, p=0.003) conferred worse PFS. CONCLUSION iMBSHH outcomes in this cohort are dependent upon WHO subgroup, histology and therapy received. These findings provide an evidence-based foundation for selection of cohorts and therapies for prospective assessment in forthcoming iMBSHH clinical trials (e.g. SIOP-CONNECT-YC-MB-LR).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".